Over the years, I have worked to define and refine a software development process that worked for me and my teams. It needed to be simple, flexible and agile yet uncompromising in a set of fundamental principles.
I started off using the Git Flow process but it didn't take long to realize that the Git Flow process was not meant for our team. It was simply too complex and not optimized for delivering SaaS software. Every part of Git Flow reeks of waterfall development and desktop software release cycles.
I wanted something similar to Git Flow, but simpler. I wanted a process that accurately modeled how we were using continuous integration and continuous deployment methodologies.
The Basic Building Blocks
Master branch == Production environment
Straightforward and simple. Continuous integration and continuous deployment take care of building all code checked into master, validating all tests pass, and automatically deploying to production. Continuous integration also will create a unique tag in git for each release.
All development is done on feature branches
No shockers here. This has been a best practice in software development for a long time and git makes this stunningly easy.
Staging branch == Staging environment
How do you test your feature branch in a non-production environment? This is where things get interesting. The staging branch is what I call an aggregate branch. It represents a clone of the master branch with one or more feature branches merged into it.
The staging branch can potentially have multiple feature branches in QA state at the same time, but each feature can be released independently by merging the associated feature branch into master.
I know what you're thinking...this won't scale to large teams, but I've personally used this flow with a team of 25 developers and not had any issues other than the occasional merge conflict. Not coincidentally, this workflow encourages developers to be aware of potential merge conflict "hot spots" and leads to better designed code as a result (ex: using small config/initializers instead of lumping all configuration into application.rb)
And if the staging branch gets into a bad state, no worries. We have a simple
nuke any aggregate branch back to a known good state using git tags
that are created via continuous integration.
Peer Review with Pull Requests
Github pull requests are incredible to facilitate discussion for feature branches. It is a transparent way for team members to review each others code and a convenient way for stakeholders to see what's going on in a project.
Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment
Continuous integration and continuous deployment need to be included from day one. These systems are the orchestration layer that perform all the heavy lifting of validating and deploying each set of changes.
Create feature branch
$ git start my-feature-branch
Test feature branch in QA/staging environment
$ git integrate staging
Create Github pull request to review changes
$ git review
Release feature branch
$ git release
And here is a presentation to help visualize the whole process.
Optimizing the command line experience for developers (and designers) has been critical to the success of this workflow. We built TheGarage-GitX Ruby gem to inject custom commands into the Git namespace and streamline the process as much as possible.
The beauty of this approach is that there is absolutely no magic. TheGarage-GitX gem is nothing more than a set of helpful git aliases that run a series of standard git operations with a single command. You can see the actual git commands it runs during each step and even avoid using the shortcuts entirely if you are comfortable with the overall flow.
Want to help new developers get up to speed on your development workflow? Just create a CONTRIBUTING.md file in your Github repository and developers will automatically see the document any time they create a pull request. Github makes the lives of developers oh-so-nice.
I've found the CONTRIBUTING.md file to be a great place to document the entire development workflow and walk developers through the process step by step.
Here is the CONTRIBUTING.md template I use by default for all new projects.
This workflow was designed and optimized for teams building SaaS products but I have even applied this framework to opensource project development with minimal variation.comments powered by Disqus